U.S. states to sue Trump administration over freezing fuel efficiency requirements

2018-chevrolet-tahoe-rst-62

Would Americans be safer if they drove heavier less-efficient vehicles for fewer miles? Jon Wong Roadshow

The Obama-era standard mandated that automobiles sold by vehicle companies have to reach 50 miles per gallon (MPG) by 2025.

"What the EPA released was a proposed rule, not a final rule". Transportation is the only sector where greenhouse gas emissions went up in 2016, the most recent data available.

The administration billed the rollback it announced on Thursday, which would also revoke California's authority to set its own strict vehicle emissions rules, as a way to lower auto prices for consumers.

The administration also projects the efficiency rules would drive up the price of cars enough to push some buyers out of the market, leaving them to remain in older vehicles lacking life-saving new technologies like assisted braking and blind spot warning.

"They imply they're going to save people a whole lot of money", Alson told ABC News.

Urban Meyer Placed On Administrative Leave By Ohio State
Meyer acknowledged last week that he had been aware of a 2009 domestic-abuse incident in Gainesville. "I don't know. The 34-year-old Zach Smith is the grandson of Meyer's mentor and former Ohio State coach Earle Bruce.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said on Twitter that "The #Trump Administration has launched a brazen attack, no matter how it is cloaked, on our nation's #CleanCarStandards". "In short, the agencies propose to maintain one national standard - a standard that is set exclusively by the Federal government". California and other states are already suing the EPA.

And while automakers initially asked the Trump administration to loosen fuel economy requirements, this impending legal battle is one they would rather avoid.

California is expected to challenge the withdrawal of the waiver in court. The timeline could then align with the finalization of the fuel efficiency changes, as the proposed rule still needs to work its way through a lengthy public comment process.

What did the White House say?

Fred Krupp, president of the Environmental Defense Fund, called the proposed rule "a massive pileup of bad ideas" that would increase pollution and raise fuel costs for consumers. Under the Obama plan, the fleetwide fuel economy would have risen gradually to roughly 47 mpg by 2025.

Honor Play Comes With GPU Turbo: Here's More to Know
Post its China launch and pricing, we will soon know if and when the Note 10 will be seen in global markets, including India. Huawei's Honor Note 10 runs on Android 8.1 Oreo operating system out of the box along with EMUI 8.2 UI running on top.

The proposal itself estimates it could cost tens of thousands of jobs - auto workers who deal with making vehicles more fuel efficient.

It's costly for companies to design and build vehicles for California and states that follow its rules, and a different set for the rest of the country. The new proposal would freeze standards at 2020 levels.

"It means that the federal government will have slightly less control over the kinds of cars and trucks people can buy", Ebell said. It might even cause vehicle prices to stop increasing so rapidly. As a result, the age of the average auto in America is now nearly 12 years old, the highest in US history, according to IHS Markit.

Chart showing EPA fuel-efficiency targets.

"There are compelling reasons for a new rulemaking on fuel economy standards for 2021-2026", said Transportation Secretary Elaine L. Chao.

Local businesses keeping watchful eye on 3D-printed guns debate
Regardless of what a person may be able to publish on the Internet, undetectable plastic guns have been illegal for 30 years. A 1988 federal law - drafted with NRA support - barred the manufacture, sale or possession of an undetectable firearm.

Pollution from cars, trucks and other on-road vehicles is the California's single-largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, according to state data. In 1989, aHarvard-Brookings study estimated that the modest 27.5 mile-per-gallon requirement at the time caused a 14 to 27 percent increase in traffic deaths because carmakers downsized vehicles. Adopting these new rules instead of the 2012 figures would have only a minimal effect on global temperature increases by the year 2100 - just three one-thousandths of a degree Celsius - the proposal claims.

Latest News